ABSTRACT
Purpose@#We aimed to investigate the benefit of a screening tool in selecting head-injured children who can potentially cooperate with computed tomography (CT). @*Methods@#The study population consisted of head-injured children aged 36 months or younger who visited the emergency department (ED) and underwent CT from January 2013 through December 2020. Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) using per os chloral hydrate or per rectal thiopental was implemented to children presumed less cooperative for CT as per a clinical screening tool for cooperative candidates for CT (e.g., ability to lie still on bed for 10 seconds without a guardian). According to the PSA and the first attempt success of CT, we compared baseline characteristics, CT findings, clinically important traumatic brain injury, ED length of stay (EDLOS), and ED disposition. @*Results@#Among the 247 children, PSA was used in 102 (41.3%). The PSA group showed a higher proportion of 3-36 months of age (PSA, 96.1% vs. non-PSA, 82.8%; P = 0.001) and longer median EDLOS (PSA, 127.0 [interquartile range, 101.0-172.0] vs. non-PSA, 85.0 minutes [63.0-130.0]; P < 0.001). The number of children undergoing the first attempt success was 213 (86.2%) without a difference in both groups (PSA, 84.3% vs. non-PSA, 87.6%; P = 0.645). In the 213 children, the implementation of PSA was associated with longer median EDLOS (PSA, 121.0 [99.0-156.0] vs. non-PSA, 77.0 minutes [60.0-122.0]; P < 0.001). In the non-PSA group (n = 145), the first attempt failure was associated with the presence of skull fracture (success, 7.1% vs. failure, 27.8%; P = 0.009). @*Conclusion@#This study suggests a potential benefit of the screening tool in selecting cooperative candidates for CT, i.e., those who could forgo PSA using oral chloral hydrate or per rectal thiopental, in young children with head injury.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#The STONE score and modified STONE score are useful clinical prediction rules for ureteral calculi. This study performed an external validation of the STONE score and modified STONE score. The purpose of this study was to minimize the economic cost and radiation exposure of computed tomography.@*METHODS@#The electronic medical records of patients complaining of flank pain from January 2016 to December 2017 at a single emergency department were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were classified into three groups according to the STONE score and modified STONE score. The prevalence of urethral calculi and other important alternative diagnoses were calculated in each group.@*RESULTS@#Out of 561 patients, 266 patients were enrolled in this study, and 222 patients (83.5%) had a ureteral calculus. The same 266 patients were compared using the two clinical decision rule, STONE score, and the modified STONE score. The patients were classified into three groups. The prevalence of ureteral stones in the STONE score was 18.8% in the low-score group, 81.7% in the moderate-score group, and 91.1% in the high-score group. The prevalence of the modified STONE score was 20.0% in the low-score group, 54.1% in the moderate-score group, and 93.0% in the highscore group. The area under the curve of the modified STONE score was 0.779 higher than the area under the STONE score curve 0.73.@*CONCLUSION@#The modified STONE score has superior diagnostic specificity to the STONE score.